I quite like this one. There's a kind of art where you get painted into a corner by the history and possibilities of art, and it's so inhibiting that all you can do is something very simple or small.
Are we running out of possibilities, though? Surely not. Perhaps if you have fixed ways of thinking about things, then that might happen. A radical shift isn't so easy. maybe MC's work is not any kind of shift, but it's a kind of narrowing of the field.
I feel a bit like that sometimes.
Sometimes also I think I like works based on what I imagine making that work to have been like. I would like to have made this. I would have enjoyed it, I would also like to be confident enough with my practice to make such a work and classify it thusly (a work).
Maybe it's just about getting rid of all the limitations. But thinking is a discipline, you develop your own way of doing it, and without that limitation, I don't know if art is possible. Without limitations. Therein lies the paradox.
That's something to work towards: the courage to strip things back further, further and further.
OK, it's definitely leave the house time.
Monday, June 15, 2009
More on Martin Creed sort of
Labels:
art,
circularity,
excess of materiality,
inhibitions,
Martin Creed,
paradox,
problem-solving,
uncertainty,
voids
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
omg you're on fire
[But thinking is a discipline, you develop your own way of doing it, and without that limitation, I don't know if art is possible. Without limitations. Therein lies the paradox.]
doors of perception, cleansed etc
o-o-o-on fire
I'm quite interesting that my question the truth of existence and artist. Title is "I really want to be true"
Post a Comment