In relation to this, this:
In other non-sequitur news, I don't work hard enough.
Wednesday, June 30, 2010
Taking a stance (albeit small)
I am not ever again going to comment on Julia Gillard's hair or clothing. Even if I think she looks nice. If I think her new 'do is unfortunate I will not mention it. If I think she's looking better and better every day, I will not mention it. It is the least I can do. Yes, I know; the very least. When I notice how she looks I will notice myself noticing.
Coming up in September: Life Summit (unrelated).
*stand. not stance. Stand. I could just correct this in the title, but for some reason it seems dishonest.
Coming up in September: Life Summit (unrelated).
*stand. not stance. Stand. I could just correct this in the title, but for some reason it seems dishonest.
Labels:
aesthetics,
fashion,
plans,
politics,
problem-solving,
resolutions
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Wednesday, June 02, 2010
Thursday, March 04, 2010
My feet reluctant linger at the gate
I'm inadvertently getting into the olde American poets. All that New York Times reading of late, I guess. I wanted to post a picture of the new Firstdraft here but I can't find them on their website, despite what Will tells me. I'm so proud of all the great stuff everyone is doing.
Why does that paragraph want to indent itself? How odd.
Transformed the very landscape seems to be;
It is the same, yet not the same to me.
So many memories crowd upon my brain,
So many ghosts are in the wooded plain,
I fain would steal away, with noiseless tread,
As from a house where some one lieth dead.
I cannot go;—I pause;—I hesitate;
My feet reluctant linger at the gate;
As one who struggles in a troubled dream
To speak and cannot, to myself I seem.
Vanish the dream! Vanish the idle fears!
Vanish the rolling mists of fifty years!
Whatever time or space may intervene,
I will not be a stranger in this scene.
Here every doubt, all indecision, ends;
Hail, my companions, comrades, classmates, friends!
Sunday, February 07, 2010
signwriting glass window paint
I just googled 'signwriting glass window paint' and one of the first hits had this as the first line of the description:
"Sign writers no longer use paint. Traditional sign writing has been replaced by vinyl lettering"
I am aghast. I know it's a dying art, but I'm going to keep carrying the fire. Hand-painted signs ROCK.
I will miss them.
"Sign writers no longer use paint. Traditional sign writing has been replaced by vinyl lettering"
I am aghast. I know it's a dying art, but I'm going to keep carrying the fire. Hand-painted signs ROCK.
I will miss them.
Thursday, January 28, 2010
Magritte et al
Some artists' work seem to make it impossible to make anything new. You're burdened by their achievements, kinda thing.
Like this:
I never used to like Magritte (for he is in truth the author of said painting), I thought he was a big cheeseball, because he was popular and accessible in the same way Klimt or Dali are, or something. But I keep running up against him. Recently (in Tokyo) I saw a whole lot of his paintings in the flesh and I just yielded. They were great; he's great. But they are really like a complete circle that appears to close off that territory for the artists that follow (like Duchamp's readymades I guess).
I saw a poster made by an artist once that listed all the object-territories captured by various artists, like:
Beuys owns felt
Kusama owns dots
(etc etc)
I often think of it. There are territories I'm interested in that I feel that way about. Like, Magritte owns semiotics, Schwitters owns collage, Andrea Fraser owns institutional critique, Thomas Demand owns models, and so on. I realise this is an uber-reductive way to think about artists, but that doesn't stop it feeling inhibiting.
But anyway, one's own desires for worldly success aside (because obviously the PR-driven media, time-poor curators and confused audiences prefer neatly packaged artist oeuvres), who wants to inhabit a bounded territory like that? How boring. That's like having to write romantic fiction or something. It's a big fat trap.
/obvious
Like this:
I never used to like Magritte (for he is in truth the author of said painting), I thought he was a big cheeseball, because he was popular and accessible in the same way Klimt or Dali are, or something. But I keep running up against him. Recently (in Tokyo) I saw a whole lot of his paintings in the flesh and I just yielded. They were great; he's great. But they are really like a complete circle that appears to close off that territory for the artists that follow (like Duchamp's readymades I guess).
I saw a poster made by an artist once that listed all the object-territories captured by various artists, like:
Beuys owns felt
Kusama owns dots
(etc etc)
I often think of it. There are territories I'm interested in that I feel that way about. Like, Magritte owns semiotics, Schwitters owns collage, Andrea Fraser owns institutional critique, Thomas Demand owns models, and so on. I realise this is an uber-reductive way to think about artists, but that doesn't stop it feeling inhibiting.
But anyway, one's own desires for worldly success aside (because obviously the PR-driven media, time-poor curators and confused audiences prefer neatly packaged artist oeuvres), who wants to inhabit a bounded territory like that? How boring. That's like having to write romantic fiction or something. It's a big fat trap.
/obvious
Indexicality
Joel Snyder:
When people talk about indexicality, they generally confuse photons with objects, and they think it is objects that are necessarily indexed by photographs. It may very well be the objects that are indexed, but nothing in the way of an object need be indexed by a photograph.
When people talk about indexicality, they generally confuse photons with objects, and they think it is objects that are necessarily indexed by photographs. It may very well be the objects that are indexed, but nothing in the way of an object need be indexed by a photograph.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
While I'm not here
This is what I've been doing with my time:
Kate Beaton: I love love love. I just keep coming back.
Asterios Polyp. Just read it, if you like comics.
While I was in Laos and Cambodia, I was digging Never Let Me Go. Also excellent.
The world is just full of stuff that's good. How are you supposed to find the time to do your own things?
Kate Beaton: I love love love. I just keep coming back.
Asterios Polyp. Just read it, if you like comics.
While I was in Laos and Cambodia, I was digging Never Let Me Go. Also excellent.
The world is just full of stuff that's good. How are you supposed to find the time to do your own things?
Labels:
books,
comics,
earnestness,
glass half full,
highly recommended,
Kate Beaton,
reading
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Staring out of windows, whining about ducks going to Moscow
There have been fireworks let off in the park near my house this evening. This after a bunch of possums/cats had a party with lots of flamenco and brawling on the corregated sunroom roof. The other night there was a flying fox (bat? I do not know) hanging in the tree directly outside the sunroom window. I've never been so close to one before. It was having a go at eating something, upside-down. It looked all wrong, gravity-wise. Like one of those pictures that's sometimes a bunny and sometimes a rabbit ... wait; I think I mean duck. Anyway. With legs that have hands to hang with when your head's upside down.
Quite strange.
I've been working on my website tonight. I decided a while ago I was going to put everything on it. Everything I still liked, that is. I'm beginning to question that decision as the project spreads into its second year. Mind you, I haven't touched it for at least six months, so ...
Sometimes I really want to post on the blog but there's nothing at all to say, so I end up doing these la-di-da kind of nowhere nothing posts about the birds or the sunlight. It's like a little hand with nothing in it, reaching out over the interwebs, grasping for something to hold on to.
Quite strange.
I've been working on my website tonight. I decided a while ago I was going to put everything on it. Everything I still liked, that is. I'm beginning to question that decision as the project spreads into its second year. Mind you, I haven't touched it for at least six months, so ...
Sometimes I really want to post on the blog but there's nothing at all to say, so I end up doing these la-di-da kind of nowhere nothing posts about the birds or the sunlight. It's like a little hand with nothing in it, reaching out over the interwebs, grasping for something to hold on to.
Friday, November 13, 2009
Banalities for Novembers
Blogs are tops. What did we ever do without them? In fact, life without the internet on the whole seems like another planet in another dimension.
In other news, my show includes subliminal nods to both Officeworks and Corporate Express. I don't think it's particularly significant, but there it is. Symbols abound.
Jemand musste Josef K verleumdet haben. Why can I not get this out of my head?
In other news, my show includes subliminal nods to both Officeworks and Corporate Express. I don't think it's particularly significant, but there it is. Symbols abound.
Jemand musste Josef K verleumdet haben. Why can I not get this out of my head?
Labels:
art,
blogging,
exhibitions,
Kafka,
questionable symbolism,
stationery,
translation
Wednesday, November 11, 2009
Trash patch
This is quite an amazing story. At first I kind of thought it might be a positive story about how ocean life is adapting effectively to this new, human-derived environment. But then I read about the fish with plastic in their stomachs and I thought, not so much. But how amazing is this? You can't tell how large it is from this picture, but if this quantity of small stuff is what's in there, how the hell could you clean it up? Size of Texas, they think this patch is.
Look how the fish are treating this area, like it's a coral reef that they interact with. The evolution of these artificial forms that find themselves with utterly alien afterlives fascinates me. It's like when you're little and you think your toys have a life of their own when you're not there; maybe there's something to that. Material things don't enact their own fates, but they're a part of the evolution of the physical environment, as shaped by all of our actions. This patch is like a garden gone wild (...and with toxicity in the groundwater).
Look how the fish are treating this area, like it's a coral reef that they interact with. The evolution of these artificial forms that find themselves with utterly alien afterlives fascinates me. It's like when you're little and you think your toys have a life of their own when you're not there; maybe there's something to that. Material things don't enact their own fates, but they're a part of the evolution of the physical environment, as shaped by all of our actions. This patch is like a garden gone wild (...and with toxicity in the groundwater).
Labels:
balance,
change,
consumerism,
disbelief,
environment,
excess of materiality,
Future,
gardening
Friday, November 06, 2009
More upbeat
I have these times when I want to do paintings/become a painter. That might happen, one day. But other times I want to become a writer (again). Both have the same problem in them; content/subject.
What of/about?
So silly. It's best just to do things, and not worry or anticipate or plan. You can always make it good later if it's crap at the start.
Anyway.
I'm feeling a little more upbeat now.
Here's a picture of something I made recently:

Just doing anything at all is usually the biggest problem for me. I think I need to do more that's messy. Precious schmecious (if you will).
What of/about?
So silly. It's best just to do things, and not worry or anticipate or plan. You can always make it good later if it's crap at the start.
Anyway.
I'm feeling a little more upbeat now.
Here's a picture of something I made recently:

Just doing anything at all is usually the biggest problem for me. I think I need to do more that's messy. Precious schmecious (if you will).
Labels:
acceptance,
art,
banality,
fimo,
opportunities lost,
procrastination,
projects,
writing
Meh, and not even original meh
I just watched a bird on a power line out the window, after hanging out there for a minute, reach across and chomp down a spider from a web. I'm aware of the banality of this observation, so perhaps it says something about my mood that it made me aware of how casually a life can be chomped up by some external force. All this angst and worry and whatever, when you can be Struck Down at any time; what's the point? Rationally, you'd conclude that with this knowledge the best strategy is to be living each moment as happily as you can and not worrying about or planning for the future. The reality of your life means nothing to the bird that sees you as dinner (for a quick second, before ceasing to think of you at all), but that personal, petty reality is so strong to you; how can you overcome being so wrapped up in it?
Wherefore perspective?
I was looking at Facebook (it's all your fault, Facebook) because I read something online about someone from primary school who is now on the BRW Young Rich List. I opened the mail and got my credit card bill and thought: What am I doing with my life, and what for?
Wherefore perspective?
I was looking at Facebook (it's all your fault, Facebook) because I read something online about someone from primary school who is now on the BRW Young Rich List. I opened the mail and got my credit card bill and thought: What am I doing with my life, and what for?
Friday, October 30, 2009
Best Picture
Fuck it, I'm going to blog more
Anyone watching Mad Men (obsessively like me)? I'm even feeding the habit peripherally through re-watching movies such as North by Northwest, The Apartment, and reading this book:

It tries to show how much things were changing in the mid-late sixties via an in-depth study of the development and production of the five movies nominated for best picture Academy Awards in 1967. It's a really good read. Super-well researched. Anyhoo, I digress.
There's an episode where Kinsey has this great idea (supposedly; I'm sceptical) but he's drunk and doesn't write it down and thereafter continually regrets the loss of the (supposedly) best idea he's ever had. The 'moral' being, write it down. That's the moral I'm choosing to take in this moment, given that there was something I needed to write down, which triggered the memory of that episode, so I've retrospectively assigned that moral to the story. I can't even remember how it was needed for the narrative. Oh yeah, I think it was to show how good Peggy is relative to her peers at coming up with ideas.
My old friend Rommel said something once about not writing all those ideas down, and getting stuck in yesterday's stale ideas and re-churning them. Put them away (or something), he says. Go fly a kite.

It tries to show how much things were changing in the mid-late sixties via an in-depth study of the development and production of the five movies nominated for best picture Academy Awards in 1967. It's a really good read. Super-well researched. Anyhoo, I digress.
There's an episode where Kinsey has this great idea (supposedly; I'm sceptical) but he's drunk and doesn't write it down and thereafter continually regrets the loss of the (supposedly) best idea he's ever had. The 'moral' being, write it down. That's the moral I'm choosing to take in this moment, given that there was something I needed to write down, which triggered the memory of that episode, so I've retrospectively assigned that moral to the story. I can't even remember how it was needed for the narrative. Oh yeah, I think it was to show how good Peggy is relative to her peers at coming up with ideas.
My old friend Rommel said something once about not writing all those ideas down, and getting stuck in yesterday's stale ideas and re-churning them. Put them away (or something), he says. Go fly a kite.
Labels:
balance,
books,
ideas,
Mad Men,
movies,
obsessiveness,
powerful moments,
reading,
tv,
writing
I promise

I hereby resolve to finish my website and have it online before the end of 2009. This joint here is for ramblings, not for sensibleness. So I'm gonna flippin' do it, orright?
I've been looking at the work of Donald Evans. It's very interesting; that whole coming up with a pretext and limitation in order to produce a very particular kind of series of work thing; that whole classification and miniaturisation of a fantasy version of the world, naming as knowing thing; that whole mail art global connectedness international languages thing; that whole copying the signifiers of a certain genre thing.
It's pleasing to see someone find a project that's so clear to them, no matter how nichey.
Labels:
art,
blogging,
classification,
Donald Evans,
obscurity,
resolutions,
shameless promotion,
tasks,
website
Friday, October 16, 2009
Cakewrecks
I adore the literalism of this

Cakewrecks killed a good half of yesterday for me.
I love google-image-searching cakes. Trust there to be a whole blog about it.
When I was in Year Nine I took an elective class for one semester, cake decorating. I do not know why. It was with Miz Clee, the least liked home ec teacher. It was pretty awful, still I learnt a lot about marzipan. I made an ugly ugly cake with lots of pastel flowers on it. No sense of imagination or humour.
Perhaps I should just be a clock repairer. I think I'd be good at something like that ('what're the hours?')

Cakewrecks killed a good half of yesterday for me.
I love google-image-searching cakes. Trust there to be a whole blog about it.
When I was in Year Nine I took an elective class for one semester, cake decorating. I do not know why. It was with Miz Clee, the least liked home ec teacher. It was pretty awful, still I learnt a lot about marzipan. I made an ugly ugly cake with lots of pastel flowers on it. No sense of imagination or humour.
Perhaps I should just be a clock repairer. I think I'd be good at something like that ('what're the hours?')
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






